Online newspaper design: expired vs. modern
by javier on 31/01/2011We’ve been ruminating on this subject for some time now but hadn’t had the time to organize our thoughts and jot them down. The opportunity came a couple of days ago when Mario García, newspaper design guru, asked specialists what they thought a modern newspaper design should look like. You can read what we had to say in García’s original post but the subject is worth expanding on.

In short:
In 1998, former Apple, former Microsoft, now journalist and consultant Linda Stone, coined the term Continuous Partial Attention. This should be the fundamental concept behind online newspaper design, what sets the difference between design that is modern and design that is expired.
Before the immediacy of the web, before feed readers, Facebook and Twitter, it took us 20 to 40 minutes to read a newspaper everyday. Today, we no longer read information in blocks, we scan for it or come by it in snippets. One article here, another one there. By the end of the day we have tailored our own newspaper with information gathered from all sorts of sources: blogs, newspapers, magazines. But it didn’t take us 40 minutes, it took us the entire day. I think there’s something there going on for newspapers if only they had the courage to move forward and forget about their print inheritance.
How can newspapers embrace this? By providing us with a homepage that:
- is easy to read, that is not cluttered or where I have to zig zag between columns.
- is continuously updated, and where updates are visible.
- doesn’t tell me what’s the most important news of the day but gives me the latest and allows me to set my own hierarchy.
- is designed to make information king (not the ads).
- visual, where without having to read much, photos can aid me to know what the story is about.
- can work in my iPad, where I don’t have to zoom in hundreds of times to reach a link.
- can inform me both superficially (online) and in-depth (to read later in my iPad).
- doesn’t organize the news into absurd sections (culture, politics, sports), but classifies it into easy to identify/searchable tags.
We’ll keep touching on this subject in the future. In the meantime, let us know if you think we have left anything out in the comments.
There are 11 comments in this article: