The iPad is the new transistor radio

by javier on 1/04/2010

I ask you to go back to the 40′s. Try to portray families in the living room, around a big wooden radio listening to national broadcasts over SW and AM… Can you see it? It was old time radio. See Daddy with his pipe, granma and the kids all listening to daytime serials, soap operas, quiz shows…

It all changed dramatically in the 50′s when the transistor was invented. Technologically it allowed for smaller and cheaper radios. It was no longer one radio per family, neither one radio in the center of the house. It meant that content wasn’t shared anymore. Content was moved to the bedroom and to the car thus alloing new forms of entertainment: late night shows where people would call to air their confessions, and music in the cars. Youngsters could have their own radio. Rock’n'Roll was then on the streets.

The iPad could be the same catalyzer today.

The iPad as a transistor

Today I read this quote on how the managers of Hulu think it makes sense to move it to the iPad:

Typically media consumption in the house was confined to the living room or home office, tablets allow consumers to serendipitously discover and consume media in every room of the house.

Jason Kilar (hulu) at The New York Times

Don’t you see parallelisms? Traditional visual media (shows, movies, series) has always been something that was consumed socially. All we wanted was good content and both the biggest scren and the biggest couch we could afford on our living room. Laptops are ok for that but still they have a design that’s optimised for work (big keyboard+trackpad, short battery span, a complex UI and OS…).

The iPad could be the transistor for the new media. It could bring consumption of narrative media (especially audiovisual content) everywhere: to the very private sphere and to the streets, allowing for new forms of consumption.

Augmented reality, yes but also… Augmented fiction!

Imagine being on a vacation in Barcelona, stopping for a café at a terraza in a cal square at the Born while watching movie scenes that happened right there, on the streets you just walked. That’s not augmented reality but augmented fiction. Same goes for long train or plane trips (movies about hijacked planes, love stories on the train? Thousands!). Nothing impossible these days, we only need a comfortable device and an app that takes care of it.

That would also be possible for cheap productions, not just big movies. If I owned a hotel and had to make a promotional video about it I’d make a short fiction film instead where the barman, concierge and all the staff are part of a cool story wich at the same time informs the customers about all the hotel facilities. I would make it available on the internet, of course, but also for customers who are already there with their tablets. I woud even put that in context with the surroundings and the nearby attractions if it was a touristic destination, so it was informative to visitors. That’s geolocalisation mixed with amateur cinema mixed with portable media devices.

Private realities

Now think of private spaces, specifically your bedroom. Transistor radios favored programs where people would call to talk about their love problems, to complain about their jobs, to make anonymous confessions. Could a iPad-like device be good at that? Could it be better than a laptop? Perhaps, if we put a camera on it.

I see the iPad as the best videoconference tool ever (if it ever comes with a camera). And now I’m thinking of chatroulette. Not the best example but maybe a good starting point if someone ever comes up with an app that has different mood or themed chatrooms where you can have *real* conversations with *normal people* (not just perverts, or piano dudes).

I’m also thinking as videodiaries, private ones, just like the one Jake Sully had on Avatar. Wouldn’t you love to see yourself 10 years in te past talking about your life back then in a decent video quality? I’d love to do that right now if I had the right tool and could do it on the spot, not just in front of a computer that needed a surface to stand.

Yes, you can do all this that I mention with a laptop or even an iPhone but they are not optimised for that. The iPhone is not good for video and carrying a laptop while traveling and opening it in the middle of the street doesn’t sould like leisure. And… welll.. I know that the first models of the iPad won’t have camera or GPS but you get the point, right?

New audiences

The transistor made radios cheap and affordable. One family, one radio was no longer valid. Now the kid could have his transistor and go out with friends to listen to music. Radio stations saw the opportunity and started to air that new music the youth were listening. Not orchestras or big bands but Rock an Roll.

The iPad will be to our parents what the transistor radio was to the 50′s youth. They now barely use the computer and are unable to take full advantage of it. Websites are not designed for them, too crammed with lots of info and buttons. Operating systems are also a nightmare for those over 50 years old.

The iPad (or any tablet where file system and OS are invisible) will make a difference for these audiences. I’m not saying anything new here, you know… “the iPad will be the perfect computer for my mom” it has been said a thousand times already. But…

I see an oportunity for content to be tailored to these audiences. There is no media for them on the web right now. Studios make movies and shows for their audience and that’s people from 15 to 45 the most. Would that change if we had 10 milion elders ready to watch movies? All the classic movies would be available for them easily. Someone would make that move. Also new fiction could be made. Videoconference would be easy for them: no window resizing, no other programs on the background that would pop and overlap confusing them… Just contacts and a call button. Grandpa could call my son from everywhere, be that his favorite armchair or in the middle of a country walk when he sees that beautiful flower they were painting days ago and wants to show it to his grandson right away.

The transistor brought true mobility for old media and morphed it into something completely different. This new device, be it the iPad or whatever similar, allows for completely new scenarios too. The most exciting thing about it is that none of them is science fiction. It’s all completely available, it only needs some work from our side, which is what I’m about to do right now.

There are 17 comments in this article:

  1. 1/04/2010Twitter Trackbacks for The Cosmonauts: The iPad is the new transistor radio [vostok.es] on Topsy.com says:

    [...] The Cosmonauts: The iPad is the new transistor radio http://www.vostok.es/blog/the-ipad-is-the-new-transistor-radio – view page – cached I ask you to go back to the 40’s. Try to portray families in the living room, around a big wooden radio listening to national broadcasts over SW and AM… Can you see it? It was old time radio. See Daddy with his pipe, granma and the kids all listening to daytime serials, soap operas, quiz shows… Filter tweets [...]

  2. 1/04/2010jotajota says:

    I am very curious to see how the iPad and its abstraction to things I am totally used to but that still confuse my parents work (I am specially thinking of file systems, but probably mice are as foreign to many users).

    I will, of course, do some testing and come back with the results. For Science!

  3. 1/04/2010Javier Cañada sobre el iPad « Realidad Aparte says:

    [...] Hoy me he puesto a leer los feeds y me he encontrado con lo que Javier piensa al respecto [...]

  4. 2/04/2010Nicolás Alcalá says:

    I agree with everything BUT, I still think iPad it’s a tremendous missed opportunity to be what you wanted it to be (which is not).

    Elder people watching movies (underline this word) in a device (double underlined) of 10 inches (come on, really? they don’t even see tv…) while sitting in any other place than the couch?

    And if less techie people is the only reason to make so simple and stupid as an iphone (which is not, because it doesn’t have a phone) and I don’t think they’re gonna use it too much… Why doing it that way?

    It just doesn’t make sense to me. Too big to be an iphone. Too simple to be a real media device (what will happen when people that already watch content would want to watch a series that, like 90% of other human beings, downloaded from the internet?).

    I still can’t see the point, but I wish I’m wrong because that transistor speech sounded really good :)

  5. 3/04/2010Julio Loayza says:

    @Nicolás:

    No creo que el iPad sea/haya sido/vaya a ser una oportunidad perdida de nada. Todo lo contrario, creo que Apple lo ha manejado muy inteligentemente. El perfil de usuario al que creo que verdaderamente va dirigido es asustadizo de la tecnología. Haberlo convertido en el último super gadget, cargado de siglas y acrónimos tecnológicos, no hubiera hecho más que aullentar a este tipo de usuario.

    Por contra, por mucho que se hubieran esforzado en hacer del iPad el último objeto de deseo geek, lo más probable es que hubiera sido criticado igualmente, ya sea por faltarle Blue-Ray, no ser Full HD, o no ser compatible con los cómics de márvel.

    En lugar de eso, han optado por enfocarse en sacar un dispositivo, sin “grandes alardes” que aporta simplicidad e inmediatez a las tareas cotidianas que puede necesitar cualquier usuario de perfil medio/bajo/muy bajo.

    Si lo consiguen, si consiguen atraer al usuario que hasta ahora la tecnología más avanzada que manejaba era el mando a distancia de la TV, lo habrán hecho. Y tranquilo, próximas ediciones podrán satisfacer más necesidades de usuarios avanzados como nosotros.

    Por otro lado. No creo que el objetivo sea conseguir que los abueletes vean películas ahí. Aunque estoy convencido de que en cuestión de horas tendremos en YouTube ejemplos de “mi abuelo enviando un email” y “mi abuela en Google”. Pero sí que una tipología de usuario que hasta ahora estaba alejada de los ordenadores, o era reticente a ellos, por fin, pueda tener acceso a lo que estos ofrecen, sin complicaciones.

    Para finalizar, como llevo diciendo un tiempo:

    El iPad no es un iPhone grande. El iPhone es un iPad de bolsillo.

    Piénsalo.

    Un saludo.

  6. 4/04/2010Nicolás Alcalá says:

    Estaría totalmente de acuerdo en lo disruptivo y genial del concepto si costase 200€, que es lo que ese tipo de público está dispuesto a pagar por algo que no necesita. Pero 500€? come on, no me vendáis que no es un juguete geek.

  7. 5/04/2010thomas says:

    Hola Javier,

    I prefer english :)

    I belive the iPad will change the general consuming behavior of media and traditional web surfing, setting a new foundation, as the iPhone did, for others to build upon. Especially papers and magazines (or what we will call them in the future) could get a much richer experience using touch interaction and seamless integration of other media types.

    I like your ideas which incorporates contextual information according to users position, something that is seen in many apps using the GPS today. But due to the screen size and interaction principals of the iPad allows for a much greater experience, “an augmented fiction” (nice word :) ) This is of course also depending on if the iPad is truly “mobile”, (I all ready heard a little complains about the weight…) but at least its a step in the right direction.

    Another aspect of the iPad is the sharing possibilities with near by people. It can easily be handed over to show off things or even to interact with (i.e. games or attendance of an meeting etc..). Also the screen allows for viewing from more edgy angles the a traditional laptop. The possibilities as a learning tool in schools could also be great.

    I am not sure the impact will be as great as the innovation of the transistor :) , but hopefully we will see some kind of revolution and the best of it is that people like you and me can be part of it :)

    /Thomas from Sweden

  8. 7/04/2010Julio Loayza says:

    (Sorry, I’d like to keep the conversation in English but I sometimes prefer to express my ideas in Spanish)

    @Nicolás: Es que desde mi punto de vista te equivocas en la idea de que el público no lo necesita. Para muchos tecnófobos o “analfabetos tecnológicos” podría ser el dispositivo sencillamente perfecto. Muchas personas huyen de los ordenadores como de la peste, les parece una tarea imposible tener que sentarse frente a una de esas máquinas que no entienden. A esas personas, si les pone sun iPad en la mano, estarán enviándote un email en cuestión de minutos. Esa es la diferencia. Ojo, esa gente “no necesita”, no comprará nunca, un ordenador. No serán 500 euros de “gasto extra”. Serán 500 euros para poder empezar a disfrutar de lo que nosotros disfrutamos desde hace 15 años ¿Caro? En absoluto.

    ¿Habrá geeks que se compren un iPad como juguete? Por supuesto, pero probablemente la mayoría de geeks simplemente no le necesiten, para ellos sí que supondrá un extra caro, y te dirán (que es lo que llevan haciendo desde su presentación) que todo eso lo pueden hacer (mentira) con su portátil, que además fue más barato (porque ¡ellos no son tontos!)

    Y es que esto te habla a las claras de que el iPad, en su concepto, es un dispositivo muy “básico”, tan básico que está “por debajo” de las necesidades de los geeks ¡Lo cual es estupendo! Porque lo coloca al alcance de los usuarios de bajo perfil tecnológico ¡Que son la inmensa mayoría!

  9. 7/04/2010Tzek says:

    Javier:

    Lo que planteas en este post tiene mucho sentido. Con la liberación de las tabletas en este año, comienza una siguiente fase. En mi caso, de no tener un smartphone a tener uno, ha cambiado de alguna forma mi actitud y nivel de consumo de información, por lo que no solo vendría toda una gama de oportunidades en la generación de información para consumo móvil, sino que podría incluso gestarse algo que derive en un nuevo tipo de producto o servicio que dadas nuestras limitaciones actuales, ni siquiera lo hemos contemplado.

    Saludos.

  10. 7/04/2010Javier Cañada says:

    @jotajota Yes, I’m getting one for science too, of course.

    @Nicolás Alcalá Nico, esto será grande, quizás no con esta versión, quizás con la siguiente, la que tenga cámara. Me juego una cenaca en alguna buena mesa de madrid, con alcohol, mujeres y drogas ;D

    @Julio Loayza Esto que has dicho: “El iPad no es un iPhone grande. El iPhone es un iPad de bolsillo.” Es tuyo? Lo digo porque me parece una frasaza totalmente “quoteable” :)

    @thomas Hey, so good to see you around. I am sure the consumption patter will change for papers and mags but I’d say it’s the apps and the monotasking that makes it differentiating. Everyday new apps appear and the business model behind it makes a lot of people squeeze their brains to come up with very creative and surpising apps. Exciting times indeed.

    @Tzek yo coincido contigo en que lo más interesante y revolucionario es lo que ni siquiera nos hemos imaginado… Esa es la innovación que me interesa, la que cambia patrones de uso por completo, la que “empowers” a los usuarios, no la que “busca un nicho” o la que “busca solucionar un problema”.

  11. 8/04/2010Julio Loayza says:

    @Javier: Lo twiteé tras cocktail cadius cervecero, que es cuando llegan las musas :-) Salvo que alguien lo hubiera dicho antes, que lo desconozco, podríamos decir que “es mío”.

    (Me “auto-quoteé” también :-P )

  12. 8/04/2010Javier says:

    @Julio he posteado la cita, espero que no te importe.

  13. 8/04/2010Julio Loayza says:

    @Javier: ¡Todo lo contrario! Un honor. Ya me hiciste la semana :-)

  14. 11/04/2010Ramm says:

    Pienso un poco como Nicolás, muy caro para lo que tiene, y si aún la gente esta discutiendo sobre su posición en el mercado es porque esta no esta clara. Lo que me lleva a pensar que la decisión de comprar estaría marcada por razones erróneas (poder adquisitivo y/o fanatismo geek) y a la vez compitiendo (en precio vs posibilidades) con netbooks y laptops.

  15. 11/04/2010Carlos Navarro says:

    @Julio Loayza: Lo que dices tiene sentido, pero no sé si el iPad está enfocado a los “tecnófobos”, como tú los llamas. Por supuesto que es un aparato que alguien sin muchos conocimientos o con fobia a los ordenadores puede usar de manera sencilla e intuitiva, pero dudo que se pueda definir como un ordenador capado para inútiles, como los móviles con teclas gigantes y un par de funcionalidades o los portátiles de juguete.
    Yo lo veo más como un producto enfocado a todo el mundo. Expertos, inexpertos, viejos, jóvenes… un dispositivo agradable, simple de usar y sin problemas, con movimientos suaves y complejamente sencillo. Algo que, si te acostumbras a llevar encima, te puede servir para navegar por internet desde tu sofá, para mirar tu mail antes de ir al trabajo sin esperar a encender el ordenador, para leer en el transporte público, para ver algún vídeo de YouTube en momentos aburridos y cien mil aplicaciones más en las que el uso del ordenador se hace demasiado aparatoso y el uso de otros productos como el iPhone se queda literalmente pequeño, por su pantalla. Y todo esto con un software infalible y muy cómodo.
    En definitiva, algo que puede resultar muy útil en la vida de muchos de nosotros. Por lo menos en la mía ;)
    Saludos!

  16. 23/06/2010fmorenop says:

    Creo que aparece en un momento en que los ebooks empiezan a ser vistos ‘sin tanto miedo’ por el público no tecnológico.
    Hablamos de años (pocos) los necesarios para que cualqueira que no use un portatil en una terracita mientras lee una anoticia en su movil será un dinosaurio… y se extinguirá.

    El ipad, en concreto es, como bien decis, un iphone con más pantalla, con esas incomprensibles carencias y ganas de que no sea un visor web ‘como díos manda’, ni una plataforma que crezca gracias a la comunidad, ni un dispositivo asequible (tal vez el mayor pero)

    Y cualquier futuro poseedor de estos apple-cacharros debería preguntar a los encargados de un apple center: ¿youtube?, ¿usb?, …

    Con lo que nos cuesta ponernos de acuerdo, y apple reinventa la rueda… cuadrada

  17. 3/08/2010sandy says:

    FLXu24 http://fgb7s3Ffjsev7yrbvqqcf7.com

Write a comment: